« The 7-Day Unlimited Pass You Can Purchase It For $31

How to Take The Metro To The Airport And Check Your Bags Before Getting On It

  by  , Thursday 27 October 2016, Categories: MY SUBWAY CARD

New Yorkers have determined feelings about their Metro, so it comes as no real surprise an editorial on the best way to repair the system released on Saturday got more than 600 opinions. Like keeping the dialogue going, I offer answers to a sample of the remarks by our readers. Having just returned from a two-week holiday in Hong Kong, I can tell you it's a public transit system about which Torontonians can merely dream. Its backbone is a modern and efficient eight-line metro system, serving one of the most densely populated areas on Earth over seven million people residing within 400 square miles. Payment is by Octopus card, which can be bought and refilled inside the metro system and at many convenience stores, where it may also be used to purchase other things. The Octopus card also works on the aboveground transit systems, including the ferries crossing Victoria Harbour, which joins Hong Kong to Kowloon.



It's possible for you to take the metro to the airport and check your bags before getting on it. The next time you see, it'll be when your flight arrives wherever it's taking you. Res Ipsa, NYC: This seems great in theory, but in practice, the tools will probably become just another sales catch by the State. Individuals of NY need some assurances the cash will be used for the stated objectives and not simply become another pot from which elected officials can make withdrawals at will. There isn't any question that residents and government watchdog groups will track how staff execute the plan and use the cash created by tools. It's healthy to be skeptical of lawmakers making huge promises, but the anxiety that fee revenue will be abused shouldn't be a reason not to act. The station platforms are glassed in, with partitions that open up concurrently with the doors, preventing suicides and people inadvertently falling onto the paths or being intentionally thrown onto them.



Despite the fact Hong Kong receives no annual snow accumulation, city planners sensibly determined decades ago that underground metros were the most productive approach to transferring individuals. In Toronto, we raise urban density in the hopes traffic congestion will make driving so depressed, people will be pushed onto our old metro system. In Hong Kong, they constructed a system for commuters who wouldn't drive automobiles even if they could manage them because it's simpler and less expensive to get around by public transit. Its funding is, in addition, world class. In 2012, the MTR generated earnings of 36 billion Hong Kong Dollars turning a profit of $2 billion in the procedure. Global, these amounts are virtually unheard of the next greatest urban speed, Singapore, is a just 125 percent. By way of example, you must learn which transport points between metro lines to use during rush hour to avoid enormous crowds waiting for trains but the criticisms are of an entirely different sequence than in Toronto. One transportation system user whined to me the MTR should have already made it possible for individuals to pay their fares using cell phones, instead of the suitable Octopus card.

Oh, and an additional matter. There's a fight happening between Uber and the cab industry in Hong Kong, also. XY, NYC: I ride the subway consistently into the city. I sometimes drive in. I'm entirely opposed to placing tolls on the East River crossings. I don't need Manhattan to be even more of a gated community. Minmin, New York: No fares on the East River until places in Brooklyn and Queens that are poorly served by public transportation have better transportation system alternatives. One manner. And to echo the thoughts of another poster: do we need Manhattan to be even more of a gated community? We should, of course, attempt to make sure the planned fees aren't regressive. But bear in mind that less than half of the city's families own automobiles. And the poor are not as likely to possess vehicles. As a Queens resident, I totally concur the M.T.A. and the city ought to enhance transportation system in that borough and Brooklyn. But transit service is fairly good along the four bridges that can get new tools under the strategy. Transit service is poorest the further you get from Midtown. That's one reason the originators of Transfer NY propose to lower tolls on bridges like the Robert F. Kennedy and the Verrazano Narrows. In the regions served by these bridges, many folks need to drive because there's just limited bus or metro service. The great thing about the strategy is that these are places which will find an expansion in transit service paid for by the new tolls.

No feedback yet

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.
(For my next comment on this site)
(Allow users to contact me through a message form -- Your email will not be revealed!)
February 2017
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28        

Search

  XML Feeds

Social CMS engine